Difference between revisions of "Notes20110425"
From Net-SNMP Wiki
					
										
					
					| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
*** A [http://nvie.com/img/2009/12/Screen-shot-2009-12-24-at-11.32.03.png very good diagram] depicting a slightly different model  | *** A [http://nvie.com/img/2009/12/Screen-shot-2009-12-24-at-11.32.03.png very good diagram] depicting a slightly different model  | ||
*** What to do with the historic tags/branches from SVN?  | *** What to do with the historic tags/branches from SVN?  | ||
| + | *** '''Release script: Wes promises to update it'''  | ||
| + | *** '''It is a mental hurdle to switch, so those promoting git will help to help those less familiar'''  | ||
| + | *** '''Need to look at the web front end to ensure it displays things properly'''  | ||
* Technical  | * Technical  | ||
** IETF Notes from March IETF  | ** IETF Notes from March IETF  | ||
Revision as of 19:45, 25 April 2011
Net-SNMP Meeting
2011-04-25
2011-04-25
| Previous: | 2011-03-21 | 
| Next: | 2011-05-? | 
This is the meeting agenda/notes for the Meeting held on 2011-04-25.
Date and Time: 2011-04-25 19:00 UTC
Agenda
-  Next Meeting
- May 23rd is chosen
 
 -  Releases
- 5.3.4
 -  5.4.4
- pre2 still due out, will get out this week
 
 -  5.7
- pre1 will go out late next week
 - trunk test 115 is broken
 - bvanassche will try and get win32 patches in for new standard mibs done
 
 -  Branch Life Times
-  Policy should have been discussed on the list by now
- How long to keep older versions up to date, given a faster release cycle
 - every other branch is LTS?
 - back porting stable features to LTS branches
 
 -  Long Term Support (LTS)
-  5.4 and 5.7 are nominated for long-term and agreed upon
- Dave notes 5.4 came out in 2006.
 
 - indecision on how long LTS releases should stay around
 - resources are the real constraint: people, hardware and bug tracking make LTS support hard
 - will bring back to a future meeting to continue discussion
 
 -  5.4 and 5.7 are nominated for long-term and agreed upon
 
 -  Policy should have been discussed on the list by now
 
 -  Administrative
-  standardizing "please write to the list" notes?  Possibly with a new wiki page with a longer explanation?
- Wes should write up a wiki page.
 - Wes has not done so as of yet
 
 -  SVN vs GIT
- Should be deciding this month about whether to switch
 - Good material on a good work flow process is in gitworkflows(7)
 - A very good diagram depicting a slightly different model
 - What to do with the historic tags/branches from SVN?
 - Release script: Wes promises to update it
 - It is a mental hurdle to switch, so those promoting git will help to help those less familiar
 - Need to look at the web front end to ensure it displays things properly
 
 
 -  standardizing "please write to the list" notes?  Possibly with a new wiki page with a longer explanation?
 -  Technical
-  IETF Notes from March IETF
- The EMAN working group is working on energy management (battery, power, etc)
 - HOST-RESOURCES-MIB update interest
 
 -  Windows Builds
- Dave hopefully has windows working? Needs wiki post about doing it.
 
 
 -  IETF Notes from March IETF
 - Round Table