Difference between revisions of "Notes20101011"

From Net-SNMP Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<!-- Reminder for Fall 2010 - will need to use "time=20" to allow for non DST -->
 
<!-- Reminder for Fall 2010 - will need to use "time=20" to allow for non DST -->
{{meetingtime|time=19|year=2010|month=10|day=11|nextyear=2010|nextmonth=11|nextday=??|prevyear=2010|prevmonth=09|prevday=20}}
+
{{meetingtime|time=19|year=2010|month=10|day=11|nextyear=2010|nextmonth=11|nextday=29|prevyear=2010|prevmonth=09|prevday=20}}
  
  
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
* Next Meeting Date
 
* Next Meeting Date
 +
** '''November 29th'''
 
* Releases
 
* Releases
 
** 5.6
 
** 5.6
 +
*** '''Wes released 5.6 but there are a couple of immediate problems'''
 +
*** Future plans for branching and 5.6.1, etc.
 +
**** '''patches tree created for 5.6'''
 +
**** '''will release 5.6.1 in december'''
 +
**** '''will do in parallel with 5.5.1 due in Jan'''
 +
*** Upload permissions
 +
**** '''dts12: Just a quick note - when creating a release directory, please make sure it's group writable.'''
 +
**** '''the mkdir should possibly go into the release script?'''
 +
*** Binary Release instructions ([[Release_Instructions]])
 +
**** '''please please please document what you do.  The big ones in my mind are solaris and win32.'''
 +
**** '''Include flags used to build with features'''
 +
*** Binary Release MIB modules (e.g. examples)
 +
**** '''what MIB modules are/should be included in binary releases?'''
 +
**** '''stew till next time'''
 +
**** '''document choices in [[Release Instructions]] though'''
 
** Next branch to target?
 
** Next branch to target?
 +
*** '''5.5.1 in January'''
 +
*** '''5.3.4 after that, probably feb or mar'''
 
* Administrative
 
* Administrative
 +
** Release Policy (http://www.net-snmp.org/dev/release-policy.html)
 +
*** '''rcN series generally goes well'''
 +
*** '''preN series is generally ignored in terms of the guidelines; this needs to be fixed'''
 +
*** '''turn around times for a release are far too long'''
 +
*** '''branch should still be created at final'''
 +
*** '''pre-release series *must* get more locked down'''
 +
*** '''policy stays the same.  We as a group need to enforce them.'''
 +
*** '''we'll switch to 1-week turn arounds for preN)'''
 +
**** '''if no changes since the last preN then likely do a rc1'''
 
* Technical
 
* Technical
 
** Future and continual discussion topics
 
** Future and continual discussion topics
*** testing infrastructure and unit tests
+
*** [[Testing Infrastructure]] and unit tests
 +
**** '''Wes will try to write up more docs and examples'''
 +
**** '''Will be a longer topic next time'''
 +
**** '''please study and review'''
 
*** build cmake vs ??
 
*** build cmake vs ??
 
*** streamlined/stripped-down library and agent
 
*** streamlined/stripped-down library and agent
 
* Round Table
 
* Round Table
 +
** Wes: a reduced and stream-lined code, along with a read-only agent

Latest revision as of 20:04, 11 October 2010

Previous: 2010-09-20
Next: 2010-11-29

This is the meeting agenda/notes for the Meeting held on 2010-10-11.

Date and Time: 2010-10-11 19:00 UTC


Agenda

  • Next Meeting Date
    • November 29th
  • Releases
    • 5.6
      • Wes released 5.6 but there are a couple of immediate problems
      • Future plans for branching and 5.6.1, etc.
        • patches tree created for 5.6
        • will release 5.6.1 in december
        • will do in parallel with 5.5.1 due in Jan
      • Upload permissions
        • dts12: Just a quick note - when creating a release directory, please make sure it's group writable.
        • the mkdir should possibly go into the release script?
      • Binary Release instructions (Release_Instructions)
        • please please please document what you do. The big ones in my mind are solaris and win32.
        • Include flags used to build with features
      • Binary Release MIB modules (e.g. examples)
        • what MIB modules are/should be included in binary releases?
        • stew till next time
        • document choices in Release Instructions though
    • Next branch to target?
      • 5.5.1 in January
      • 5.3.4 after that, probably feb or mar
  • Administrative
    • Release Policy (http://www.net-snmp.org/dev/release-policy.html)
      • rcN series generally goes well
      • preN series is generally ignored in terms of the guidelines; this needs to be fixed
      • turn around times for a release are far too long
      • branch should still be created at final
      • pre-release series *must* get more locked down
      • policy stays the same. We as a group need to enforce them.
      • we'll switch to 1-week turn arounds for preN)
        • if no changes since the last preN then likely do a rc1
  • Technical
    • Future and continual discussion topics
      • Testing Infrastructure and unit tests
        • Wes will try to write up more docs and examples
        • Will be a longer topic next time
        • please study and review
      • build cmake vs ??
      • streamlined/stripped-down library and agent
  • Round Table
    • Wes: a reduced and stream-lined code, along with a read-only agent