Difference between revisions of "Talk:Administrative Meetings"

From Net-SNMP Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Policy re new discussion topics)
 
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
Would it be acceptable to add potential topics for discussion to the
 
Would it be acceptable to add potential topics for discussion to the
 
"Future Topics" list? <BR> [[User:Dts12|Dts12]] 13:39, 5 February 2007 (PST)
 
"Future Topics" list? <BR> [[User:Dts12|Dts12]] 13:39, 5 February 2007 (PST)
 +
:Seems like a good thing for the talk page, actually...  I'm actually going to protect all the pages just to keep them from being misused.  Any of the -admins should know how to get around this if they had to (the point isn't a coup; it's stability and consistency). [[User:Wes|Wes]] 14:00, 5 February 2007 (PST)
 +
::I'd suggest that we might need a training session, or some similar instructions.  I for one have no idea how the wiki admin stuff works.  I'm sure it's all fairly obvious once you know where to look, but at the moment I wouldn't know where to start.  That doesn't bother me particularly ATM, but it would be good to have the option in due course -  [[User:Dts12|Dts12]] 14:51, 5 February 2007 (PST)
 +
:::Well, my point wasn't that you need to.  My point was more if I died you're not left in a lurch and I'm not trying to do a hostile take over of the pages.  I do think, however, this is one area that needs to be more carefully controlled as it represents our decisions on things as well as has a direct effect on our meetings, past, etc.  Hence the reason I think the pages should be carefully controlled and maintained (by me). [[User:Wes|Wes]] 16:34, 5 February 2007 (PST)
 +
::::Per discussion on mailing list, all pages unprotected again for maximum user contribution. [[User:Wes|Wes]] 08:33, 6 February 2007 (PST)

Latest revision as of 16:33, 6 February 2007

Qn: Would it be acceptable to add potential topics for discussion to the "Future Topics" list?
Dts12 13:39, 5 February 2007 (PST)

Seems like a good thing for the talk page, actually... I'm actually going to protect all the pages just to keep them from being misused. Any of the -admins should know how to get around this if they had to (the point isn't a coup; it's stability and consistency). Wes 14:00, 5 February 2007 (PST)
I'd suggest that we might need a training session, or some similar instructions. I for one have no idea how the wiki admin stuff works. I'm sure it's all fairly obvious once you know where to look, but at the moment I wouldn't know where to start. That doesn't bother me particularly ATM, but it would be good to have the option in due course - Dts12 14:51, 5 February 2007 (PST)
Well, my point wasn't that you need to. My point was more if I died you're not left in a lurch and I'm not trying to do a hostile take over of the pages. I do think, however, this is one area that needs to be more carefully controlled as it represents our decisions on things as well as has a direct effect on our meetings, past, etc. Hence the reason I think the pages should be carefully controlled and maintained (by me). Wes 16:34, 5 February 2007 (PST)
Per discussion on mailing list, all pages unprotected again for maximum user contribution. Wes 08:33, 6 February 2007 (PST)