[2012/05/11 06:38:01] #net-snmp <BigB> Hi
[2012/05/11 06:38:18] #net-snmp <BigB> Hi guys
[2012/05/11 07:09:43] #net-snmp <mjf> Hello. In snmptrapd_sql.c there are two SQL inserts. I have some problems to pair all the values inserted with the FORMAT SPECIFICATION from smtptrapd(8). Is this information provided? The problem is that the manual page speaks in other words than there are the enums or comments in the source .c file. :(
[2012/05/11 07:19:10] #net-snmp <mjf> To explain more further, for instance, there is TBIND_TYPE with comment "pdu type" in the .c file, but I can not find an equivalent to it in the FORMAT SPECIFICATION section of the manual page.
[2012/05/11 09:28:20] #net-snmp <_jdccdevel> Hi! I have a question about the C API. Is there any way to tell net-snmp to re-read all the mibs? i.e. re-run init_snmp() with different options?
[2012/05/11 09:49:11] #net-snmp <rstory-work1> _jdccdevel: there isn't an easy way, as all our apps are short-lived and don't need to re-read mibs.. i'm not sure if there's a hard way either.. you'd have to poke about in the code to find the right functions..
[2012/05/11 10:15:05] #net-snmp <rstory-work1> mnash: nightly tarballs should start being updated again..
[2012/05/11 10:21:00] #net-snmp <lcf`> anyone knows if there's an ETA for committing the fix for http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2012-2141 ?
[2012/05/11 13:49:26] #net-snmp <fenestro> lcf`: do you know if anyone has submitted it to net-snmp, or did red hat and debian keep it to themselves?
[2012/05/11 13:54:35] #net-snmp <lcf`> fenestro, I've failed to find any reference in the mailing lists
[2012/05/11 13:55:18] #net-snmp <lcf`> fenestro, there's a patch in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815813, not sure if this will be the final fix though
[2012/05/11 13:57:53] #net-snmp <fenestro> right, my point was that there's nothing in the net-snmp patch tracker or on the mailing list
[2012/05/11 14:03:33] #net-snmp <lcf`> fenestro, ok, I'll report it later in the bug tracking system